Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- == Set theory questions== These questions depend on your knowledge of [[../Set theory/]]. ...1 KB (220 words) - 22:15, 12 October 2007
- {{mergeto|Set Theory/Axioms}} *The empty set exists ...1 KB (189 words) - 22:00, 12 October 2007
- ...ebra''', an advanced set of topics related to [[Algebra]]. Readers of this book are expected to have read and understand the information presented in the [ ...me arity and <math>\nu</math> is an interpretation of these symbols on the set. ...2 KB (214 words) - 22:36, 25 February 2008
- ...cs is based upon arithmetic, algebra, then calculus. To understand why set theory is important, we should look at the fundamental question of what mathematic ...y that mathematics works," they are in fact only conveniences. Any defined set of rules is a valid construct in mathematics, but some (the ones that are s ...3 KB (573 words) - 00:26, 4 December 2007
- {{mergefrom|Set Theory/Zermelo-Fraenkel Axiomatic Set Theory}} ...letter—capital, lowercase, roman, Greek, etc.—will represent a set unless otherwise stated. We must also accept the basic property of ''membe ...5 KB (930 words) - 00:36, 4 December 2007
- ...error check have been done; so do not trust the materials presented in the book blindly. ...e maybe missing, many proofs unfinished or erroneous, the structure of the book incoherent etc. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 07:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC) ...3 KB (398 words) - 22:43, 10 October 2007
- ...e the empty set <math>\emptyset</math>; the ordinal 1 is defined to be the set <math>\{0\}</math>, which is of course equal to ..., 1, 2, 3\}</math>. Any finite ordinal <math>n</math> is defined to be the set <math>\{0, 1, 2, \ldots, n-1\}</math>. ...2 KB (274 words) - 14:50, 22 January 2008
- ...vious chapter, we will now proceed to develop a more axiomatic theory. Our theory will avoid the ambiguities of probability, and allow for a simpler mathemat ==Formal Theory== ...3 KB (604 words) - 21:31, 2 January 2008
- ...short, concise introduction to the basic set concepts used throughout this book. It is not meant to be a comprehensive text book on set theory, for that see elsewhere in Wikibooks. ...2 KB (443 words) - 12:18, 9 January 2008
- ...and ''B'' using the axioms of union and pair. By axiom of pair {A,B} is a set, so define by axiom of union <math>A \cup B = \cup \{A,B\}</math>. [[Category:Set Theory (book)]] ...1 KB (203 words) - 22:00, 12 October 2007
- *[[/Symbols|Symbols used in this book]] *Measure theory: ...3 KB (346 words) - 19:33, 22 January 2008
- ...nd topology, so the coverage of each of these fields is quite broad. This book is concerned in particular with analysis in the context of the Real numbers ...Set Theory]]. Of special note are the sections on infinite sets and [[Set Theory/Cardinals|cardinality]]. In many places, but particularly for work on Sequ ...2 KB (362 words) - 00:59, 19 October 2007
- '''The Size of a Finite Set''' ...ite, however, because we can't count the number of elements in an infinite set. ...2 KB (335 words) - 21:59, 12 October 2007
- General Topology is based solely on set theory and concerns itself with structures of sets. It is at its core a generaliza * [[/Set Theory/]] ...6 KB (786 words) - 12:28, 30 January 2008
- == Basic Set Theory == ...ects so the concept of mathematical thinking can be understood. In this book we will use capital letters for sets and lowercase letters for elements of ...12 KB (2,194 words) - 01:44, 5 April 2007
- The review of set theory contained herein adopts a naive point of view. We assume that the meaning of a set as a collection of objects is intuitively clear. ...8 KB (1,480 words) - 21:33, 2 January 2008
- ...x\in \mathbb C</math> and <math>y\in \mathbb C^2</math>. Let us consider a set <math>U\subset \mathfrak U</math>. We have: ...'ll be rolling smoothly off your tongue by the time you are done with this book. So, why do Haskellers like the language then? Is it just because we like ...7 KB (953 words) - 18:30, 11 October 2008
- [[Probability]] theory mathematically formulates incomplete knowledge pertaining to the likelihood ...s about likelihoods of events using the same terminology as in probability theory. Often, this has nothing to do with any formal definition of probability, ...10 KB (1,653 words) - 21:30, 2 January 2008
- == Empty Set == *<math>\hbox{There is a set } A \hbox{ s.t. } \{x \mid x \notin A\} </math> ...2 KB (470 words) - 22:00, 12 October 2007
- ...hoice is named as such because it is independent from Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory axioms. Thus, the addition of Choice to ZF enables work not previously pos ...y [[w:Total order|chain]] in a [[w:partially ordered set|partially ordered set]] S has an upper bound, then S has a maximal element. ...7 KB (1,305 words) - 22:00, 12 October 2007