Number Theory/Elementary Divisibility

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Elementary Properties of Divisibility

Divisibility is a key concept in number theory. We say that an integer a is divisible by an integer b if there exists an integer c such that a=bc.

For example, the integer 123456 is divisible by 643 since there exists an integer, namely 192, such that 123456=643192.

We denote divisibility using a vertical bar: a|b means "a divides b". For example, we can write 643|123456.

The following theorems illustrate a number of important properties of divisibility.

Prime numbers

A natural number p is called a prime number if it has exactly two distinct natural number divisors, itself and 1. The first eleven such numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, and 31. There are an infinite number of primes, however, as will be proven below. Note that the number 1 is generally not considered a prime number even though it has no divisors other than itself. The reason for this will be discussed later.

Theorem 1

Suppose a,b,d,r, and s are integers and d|a,d|b. Then d|(ra+sb).

Proof:

There exists e and f such that a=de and b=df. Thus

ra+sb=rde+sdf=d(re+sf).

We know that re+sf is also an integer, hence d|(ra+sb).

Corollary

Suppose a,b,d and r are integers and d|a,d|b. Then d|(a+b),d|(ab), and d|ra.

Proof: Letting r=1 and s=1 in Theorem 1 yields d|(a+b). Similarly, letting r=1 and s=1 yields d|(ab). Finally, setting s=0, yields d|ra.

Theorem 2

If a,b,c are integers and a|b,b|c then a|c.

Proof:

Let us write b as b=ad and c as c=be for some integers d and e.

It follows that

c=ade=a(de), and hence a|c.

Theorem 3

If a,b,c are integers and c0, then a|b if and only if ac|bc

Proof:

a|b implies that there exists an integer d such that

b=ad

So it follows that

bc=(ac)d and hence ac|bc.

For the revese direction, we note that ac|bc implies there exists an integer d such that

bc=(ac)d.

We know that c is non-zero, hence

b=ad.

This proves the theorem.

Theorem 4

Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic(FTA)

Every positive integer n is a product of prime numbers.

Proof:

We prove this theorem by contradiction.

Let N be the smallest positive integer that is not a product of prime numbers. Since N has to be composite, it can be written as N = a b with a, b > 1. It is

1<a,b<N.

We conclude that the theorem is true for a and b because N was the smallest counterexample. Hence there are primes p1,p2,,pk such that

a=p1p2pk

and primes q1,q2,,ql such that

b=q1q2ql.

Hence

N=ab=p1p2pkq1q2ql,

which is a contradiction.


Alternative Proof:

This is an inductive proof.

The statement is true for N=2

Suppose the statement is true for all kN

N+1 is either composite or prime. If N+1 is prime, then the statement is true for k=N+1

If N+1 is composite, then N+1 is divisible by some prime, p<N+1, so k=N+1 can be written as a product of p and some number <N+1.

Hence N+1 can be written as a product of primes.

It follows that the statement is true for all kN+1 and hence by induction for all .

Theorem 5

There are infinitely many primes.

Proof:

Suppose that there are only k primes.

Let these primes be: p1,p2,...,pk.

Let n=p1p2...pk+1. Then either n is prime, or it is a product of primes. If is is a product of primes, it must be divisible by a prime pi for some i. However, npi=p1p2...pk+1pi=p1p2...pi1pi+1...pk+1pi which is clearly not an integer: n is not divisible by pi. Hence, n is not a product of primes.

This is a contradiction, as by Theorem 4, all numbers can be expressed as a product of primes.

Therefore, either n is prime or it is divisible by some prime greater than pk.

We conclude that the assumption that there are only k primes is false.

Thus there are not a finite number of primes, i.e., there are infinitely many primes.

Theorem 6

Division with smallest nonnegative remainder

Let a and b be integers where b>0. Then there exist uniquely determined integers q and r such that

a=bq+r

and 0r<b.

Proof:

We define the set

M={xxab}

which is nonempty and bounded from above. Hence it has a maximal element which we denote by q.

We set r=abq. It is r=abqabab=aa=0 and r<b, because otherwise

br=abq.

This implies

q+1ab

which contradicts to the maximality of q in M.

We now prove the uniqueness of q and r:

Let q and r be two integers which satisfy a=bq+r and 0r<b. It is

|b(qq)|=|rr|<b

and thus |qq|<1 which implies q=q. This also shows r=r and we are done.

Index